Home > Ohio > Cedar Point > Disaster Transport > Review Comments


 Review of Disaster Transport @ Cedar Point
1 Rating Posted by: gyk182 on 12/14/2004 3:49:00 PM
Disaster Transport has the ptoential to become a great ride. Their first mistake is calling it a coaster. Technically, it is, but when people queue up for an indoor roller coaster, they expect Flight of Fear from Paramount, not Space Mountains little cousin who tries way to hard to be just like Space Mountain (Which isnt all that fast-paced of a ride to begin with.) The theming is second rate, but has the ability to have so much more. First off, its like you are in some kind of space travel place. I dont get it, because the in the first entry room, there are pictures of posters depicting tips ot Atlantis, Paris, and Rome. It doesnt fit the theme of space. After a series of rooms having no specific theme, guests enter Maitenence Bay 1, where there is a large, obviously fake reactor tube that lights up and whirs like a lawn mower. After being led through countless other rooms, (while listening to people all around you, and often yourself going "The ride must be right around this corner..." But it never is.) you are finally hereded up stairs to some little room where ONE person is loading the cars, checking the seatbelts, and hitting the button to send them off. Yet they still give a thumbs up to the other non existent co-workers. People oftn complain that the ride is boreing and short. Its not that I dont agree, but its not entirely Cedar Points fault. You see, Disaster Transport was originally called "Avalanche Run." It is a bobled coaster, meaning there is one lift hill and the rest of the ride has to be downhill at a fairly pointed angle, or the ride could just stop. Therefore, the weight of the people in the car affect the ride time. All that CP did was cover Avalanche Run in a building and add a space theme. Its stillt he same ride in the same spot. As I said, its a bobsled coaster, so it cannot go UP any hills other thean the first one, and since theres only so much room in that building, it has to spiral a lot and moved downards while staying in a very small vicinity (hence the many many tight helixes.) How to improve this ride? one word: Themeing... A gift bestowed deeply upon Universal and Disney, but stolen from Cedar. Why is this Raptor dragging us through the air? If it were at Disney or Universal, wed find out exactly why in a technologically advence, story-line ridden preshow. But here? We are invited into some big building that plays no significant role in the ride except to house it and are ushered past signs of space trips... to paris... Mixed themeing is a no no! If this ride could recive a story line to compliment its name (which holds such promising possibilies) this ride might be worth it. Suppose your asked to tour a space flight facility when something goes wrong and a comet is headed for a space station. The touring facility announces that they will need you to go on a secret mission to the Space Station to save the astronauts. Add quicker loading time and a preshow to control crowds and your all set! Your on your way to save sum astronauts! Its that simple people! Try thinking of ways to make rides better instead of just sayin how stupid they are!
 

Review Comments

Scott on 12/14/2004 7:06:13 PM said:
If you gave this a 5 why is it in your top ten? :withstupid:
Hercules on 12/14/2004 7:18:01 PM said:
Wow. That is a heck of a review. I didnt read it because it was so long... but I am sure it is a heck of a review. Welcome to the site. That is true though... if it is only a 5, then why is it your number 6 ride. In skimming over the review, I do agree that it should have some sort of cool storyline or something. I have never been on the ride but would love to try it out, so I dont have much room to talk, but a storyline is a cool thing to have. It gives the ride character. But, I do disagree with you in the fact that you said that the ride HAS potential. I believe that the HAD potential, but it has just simply past its time. It already has a bad name with many people that I know and talk to, so I dont really think that there is much saving it now no matter what.
gyk182 on 12/14/2004 9:54:17 PM said:
very true
Scott on 12/14/2004 10:33:12 PM said:
Glad to see that you fixed another one of your "GREAT" reviews (and I mean it). Im sorry if I wasnt being very nice or welcoming LOL
Axman on 1/30/2005 3:01:02 PM said:
Dude, cut this ride some slack. Not all roller coasters can be as good as Top Thrill Dragster or have as elabrate themeing as Dueling Dragons, but at least they tried.
gyk182 on 2/9/2005 4:31:30 PM said:
Yes, they did, and the whole point of my review is that, while this ride is fun, its age is beginning to show. Since coasters cant get much faster or taller than Kingda Ka without ripping peoples heads off with the extreme speed, I think Cedar Point might as well face that theyll soon loose the world record and they need to stop trying to make coasters bigger and bigger. Id say, beat Kingda Ka one time, then start trying to revamp and increase the rest of the park! thats just my idea. I mean, how many roller coasters can they have that look just like top thrill only taller and taller until they finally realize theyve reached the limit! (By the way, my personal belief is that Cedar Point will regain the record without building anymore coasters at all... If TTD cant make it to the top of the hill sometimes and the cord snaps reguarly, what makes you think it can get even higher and fasteR? I think KK will fail! Im probly wrong, but thats my humble opinion.
BobFunland on 2/9/2005 6:41:45 PM said:
They are increasing the thrust by launching faster, so the train will lose its momentum after a slightly longer period of time, hence, an additional 36 feet, but there is a good chance that it too could have rollbacks (part of the thrill for some folks)
coaster05 on 2/9/2005 9:05:48 PM said:
If you rode DT the first couple years the story, though weak, made some sense. Now it is just the line pretty muck. Maybe they should retheme or go back to it being open air like it was.
gyk182 on 2/11/2005 11:04:08 AM said:
Theyve given up on it and just decided to keep getting bigger and better when they could and should be taking care of the older rides just as much.
Post Review Comment
You must login or create an account to post a review comment.

 
Clicky Web Analytics