Home > Massachusetts > Six Flags New England > Cyclone > Review Comments


 Review of Cyclone @ Six Flags New England
3 Rating Posted by: Timberman on 8/6/2005 1:08:00 AM
I first rode Cyclone circa 2002, after all the butchery had already been committed, and it reminded me of the painful, public decline of Chuck Norris: every once in a while it would throw you a really good move, but mostly it just lurched along in a stoic, wooden manner with very little inspiration or excitement. I was pulling for the Cyclone, just like I spent years pulling for Chuck. But all the great stuff Id heard so much about -- the world-beater status, the full-contact credibility -- seemed to have happened in another era. The here and now was mostly a Walker-like pastiche of embarrassing slow-motion movements, the same moves that at full-speed used to wow the fans and intimidate the haters.

You could still feel some spirit there, a sense that this old warhorse maintained some guts. But it had become, in its declining years, a pale imitation of its former glory, like the painful spectacle of a former world-class athlete pushing cheap exercise gizmos on late-night television. True, it could still land a backfist on your soup cooler once in a while, but in the end, these moments felt more annoying than thrilling, just gratitutous punishment that never amount to anything. Slowed and dumbed-down for the masses, it simply lacked that knock-out power.

Well, its heart was always in the right place, so you cant feel anger or betrayal, only regret. Maybe if it had better handlers. Maybe if it had kept in better shape. Maybe if it had stuck to its core audience, instead of trying to please everyone. Whatever the case may be, we cant live in the past. Jet-Li-like GCIs await us, and in S&S Power, we may have found our next Bruce Lee.

Yet let us pause for a moment to remember the cowboy-hat and chest-hair era, and give a silent nod of respect to one that arrived too late and lingered too long. Goodbye, Cyclone. We always believed in what you stood for.
 

Review Comments

Hercules on 8/10/2005 3:57:54 PM said:
I would like to apologize right from the start if I say anything that is even slightly offensive in the post, but it is not meant to be. Timberman, when you first came to this site and started writing reviews, I like many others were in awe of your writing talent and how you were able to paint a picture with your words to describe a ride experience like nobody else around here. Your reviews and posts are what really caused me to step it up in terms of the way I wrote reviews. I took things more seriously and really wanted to get my message across like I do with my school work and my various jobs. However, with this review and a few of your more recent ones, I just dont understand. I mean, I get what you are saying about the ride, but Im not sure if you think this is a coaster and theme park site or a Chuck Norris appreciation forum. There was nothing overly helpful in terms of describing the ride experience. I understand what you mean in this, but some might not. I have been on the ride and I agree with you stance on the matter, but I just dont see how this is helpful to those who have not been on the ride or know of it. There is nothing about the experience of the ride itself. I think you are just trying to get too cute. I dont mean this in a harse or mean way which I hope you understand. Thanks for your time. I hope to read your great words more, but I just hope they can really help out those who need a little bit of guidance.
Timberman on 8/10/2005 6:14:37 PM said:
Man, you sound like me after the Clash released "Sandinista." But seriously, no offense taken, Hercules. I like to vary my approach and not everything I try is going to appeal to everyone. In this particular case, I guess I agreed with much of what had already been said about the Riverside Cyclone so I was trying to use what I thought was an apt analogy to describe my overall impression of the ride. Of course, you make an excellent point: if one is unfamiliar with Chuck Norris, then the review isnt going to be any help at all. I appreciate your feedback, Herc, and I will take your comments under advisement for future reviews. We all need to keep each other honest on this site. I do like to have a little fun with words and allusions once in a while, but I dont want to get so carried away as to be irrelevent or to alienate my fellow critics. I usually only review rides that left a distinct impression on me, and sometimes the overall effect is easier to write about than the component aspects. But I think you put your finger on something important: the more obtuse my illusions, the less I can actually remember about the rides specifics. Anyway, when I start lapsing into haiku and limericks (or sheep noises and little kid voices, as the Clash did on their infamous triple album), I will be counting on you to call my bluff.
larrygator on 8/10/2005 11:33:50 PM said:
I agree, what the hell was "The only band that matters" thinking. Two decent tracks on a triple album
hrrytraver on 8/11/2005 10:38:58 AM said:
timberman, i thought it was a humorous review, and a spot on analogy. hercules makes an interesting point, perhaps you should join a chuck norris appreciation forum! im sure theyre out there. they probably go on and on ad nauseum in the way that "DLR vs. SH" arguments go in van halen forums.
papa1958 on 8/11/2005 11:12:00 AM said:
I liked Timbermans review as well. Come-on Herc -- this site is much more fun and thought provoking when guys like Timberman go to the trouble to be a little different sometimes.
PeterD on 8/11/2005 12:34:46 PM said:
Having only been a member of this site for a week, I really enjoy Timbermans approach to reviewing. You could read about peoples experiences on a ride in almost every review, but Timberman has been able to utilize analogies and use beautiful language to write a different style review that make them the most enjoyable to read on this site. I hope no other reviewers take offense to that statement, but the reviews Ive seen under Timbermans name are impossible to emulate. Although I cant always agree with the scores and reviews having grown up in the B&M era, I hope you continue to write in the fashion that have been writing in so far in order to add something special to this site that I feel nobody else can do.
Timberman on 8/11/2005 7:54:32 PM said:
Thanks, everyone, for your comments. Im happy for any reaction to my reviews, as long as its not indifference.

Larrygator - I have to admit, some of the deep cuts have grown on me over the years, but you have to wonder how "Shepherds Delight" wound up on the same album as "Police on My Back."
larrygator on 8/11/2005 11:47:44 PM said:
"Police on My Back", "Midnight Log" and 34 tracks that are schlock in my opinion. I have to admit I didnt remember Shepherds Delight so I just listened to the first 20 seconds. I couldnt listen to any more
mrceagle on 8/12/2005 2:45:15 PM said:
The cyclone today really just a shell of its old self.
Timberman on 4/18/2006 7:33:01 PM said:
Just in case anybody needs a little background material on Chuck Norris to understand this review:

http://www.4q.cc/index.php?pid=top100&person=chuck

Clearly, if hes read this, Im as good as dead.
Post Review Comment
You must login or create an account to post a review comment.

 
Clicky Web Analytics