Home > Ohio > Cedar Point > Millennium Force > Review Comments


 Review of Millennium Force @ Cedar Point
-1 Rating Posted by: Emma on 6/14/2003 8:59:00 PM
9.5! This is my new favorite. Its smooth, fast, and has a wonderfully intimidating first drop.
 

Review Comments

Red Rascal on 6/14/2003 9:04:02 PM said:
Why isnt it a full 10 if its your "new favorite"?
Emma on 6/15/2003 10:56:38 AM said:
You never know what rides the future holds! Im saving my 10. Besides, 10 means perfect, and no ride Ive ridden so far is completely perfect.
Red Rascal on 6/15/2003 11:01:21 AM said:
You know, you can give out as many 10s as you want. 10 means you enjoyed the ride very much.
Emma on 6/15/2003 11:10:27 AM said:
You do it your way, Ill do it my way! Like I said, 10 is a perfect score, and its not a perfect ride.
MovieCoast on 6/15/2003 12:05:34 PM said:
Thats a good theory Emma.
meowmix123 on 6/15/2003 1:10:27 PM said:
Why dont you say what the ride doesnt have that COULD make it a 10.. since its a 9.5
MovieCoast on 6/15/2003 3:21:27 PM said:
Who cares?
bista on 6/17/2003 12:20:33 PM said:
Meowmix123 has a valid point. Whatever floats your boat, but Id also like to see in all reviews what a ride is lacking (if such is the case).
Emma on 6/18/2003 6:38:45 PM said:
The ride could use a few more bunny hills for airtime. (A higher drop wouldnt hurt, either!) Is that good enough, or should I draw you a picture?
Red Rascal on 6/18/2003 8:35:57 PM said:
If you want a higher drop, go on TTD.
Emma on 6/19/2003 5:32:52 PM said:
I tried to go on TTD, but it was closed the entire week I was at Cedar Point! Cant wait to ride it soon!
Red Rascal on 6/19/2003 6:15:49 PM said:
Its supposed to be open now.
Emma on 6/21/2003 9:54:22 AM said:
I live about 14 hours away, so it may be awhile before I get to try it. . .
SFGA_fan on 6/21/2003 11:57:44 AM said:
Saying Millennium Force could use a higher drop, is like saying The Beast could be longer. It has the second highest lift hill in the world and one of the steepest drops. Saying it should have a higher drop is just Ludacris. And second of all this ride doesnt need airtime, its not design to be an air time filled coaster, even though there are four good spots of air time, it is designed to give you the feeling that your going very fast the entire ride, which you are anyways. And by the 9.5 would round up.
bb_dg on 6/21/2003 12:34:14 PM said:
well said SFGA_fan
Emma on 6/25/2003 8:39:38 AM said:
Im not as lenient with my reviews as you people are. Just because its at Cedar Point doesnt mean its perfect. I stand by what Ive said. If you dont like my opinions, tough. Dont read my reviews anymore.
Emma on 6/25/2003 8:39:55 AM said:
Im not as lenient with my reviews as you people are. Just because its at Cedar Point doesnt mean its perfect. I stand by what Ive said. If you dont like my opinions, tough. Dont read my reviews anymore.
Red Rascal on 6/25/2003 9:06:51 AM said:
How many times have you gone on MF?
Emma on 6/25/2003 3:18:33 PM said:
Nine times: six - front seat, three - back seat
CAH on 6/26/2003 6:57:32 PM said:
SFGA_fan: Its a good thing youre not a coaster designer. Wed all still be riding Mauch Chunk. I gave MF a 10, but I also think it could have been designed with more airtime(without giving up speed). Emma is just giving her opinion, and you guys are taking it personally. Its not like you gave birth to MF.
SFGA_fan on 6/26/2003 11:08:15 PM said:
What are you talking about, and how does anything I said have anything to do with a switchback railway. This ride is amazing, and i dont think CP could have done better with 25 million dollars. She said she wanted it taller, I was just commenting on that statement, considering there are only 2 real roller coasters in the world taller than it. God your probably one of those frickin idiots who comes on this site and posts for like a day and then leaves after saying alot of dumb stuff. Next time you post, read what youve written and make sure it makes sense. Mauch Chuck? Really lets keep it relevant.
Emma on 6/27/2003 4:04:29 PM said:
CAHs comments were very relevant and made perfect sense to me, but perhaps his put-down was a little over your head. Let me simplify it for you, SFGA_fan. . .You bashed my review of MF, claiming that my OPINIONS were wrong.(I think the word you used was Ludacris, which isnt even an adjective, its a rapper, I believe.) You said MF is high enough, The Beast is long enough. Blah blah blah. As CAH said, if coaster designers were as easily satisfied as you, the coaster industry wouldnt exist today, hence the Mauch Chuck reference. Youre probably one of those frickin idiots who comes on this site and posts a bunch of BS just to get your name on the active critics list, then cant take it when someone bites back. And speaking of proofing your posts, maybe you should pay more attention in your grammar classes at school.
CAH on 6/27/2003 7:42:34 PM said:
SFGA_fan: If you will go back and read my reviews you will be able to tell Im not going to go away in one day. Although Ill admit I dont waste all of my time trying to bash people over the net. Oh by the way, Mauch Chunk(or Mauch Chuck as you like to call it)is more relevant than your Beast comment. Obviously it points out that if people were only satisfied with Mauch Chunk(as you are with MF) then we would not be riding such great coasters today. Why would you not want MF to be taller and with more airtime? What do you have against that?
SFGA_fan on 6/27/2003 11:38:23 PM said:
Ok do u understand that money doesnt grow on trees. Millenium Force was the tallest ride in the world at that time. If they were to make it taller it would have costed much more money. And saying it could be taller is ridiculous because it is already 300 ft tall, and was, and still is a very advanced ride. So I dont see how being satisfied with Millenium Forces turns me into someone who doesnt want to move forward with rides. And how is Mauch chunk more relevant than my beast comment. Isnt comparing the third tallest ride in the world and the 4th longest ride in the world a decent comparrison. Guess not. And as for you emma, yes i post to get my name up there, that makes sense considering ive been here for two years and have only 400 some odd posts. Yup im doing a great job of keeping my name up on the active posters list. O and ur going to critique my spelling, well sorry, u want to critique spelling go talk to Mrceagle.
Emma on 6/28/2003 11:13:21 AM said:
What does money have to do with anything? This isnt theme park budget, its theme park critic! I gave the ride a nine because I did not think it was a perfect ten, regardless of its price tag. I gave my OPINIONS of what would make it a ten. I had no idea so many people were going to be offended. I have no problem with people giving their opinions about a ride, considering that is the point of this website. What I do have a problem with is people telling me that my opinions and thoughts are wrong, as they are opinions not facts. Moreover, the only time youll see my name on a post is if it is my review or in defense of my review. I dont go around bashing peoples reviews. I support free thinking. I am having a great time arguing with you, though.
SFGA_fan on 6/29/2003 1:53:59 AM said:
I;m sorry for making it sound like I had anything against ur review, u have ur own opinion. All I was saying is that in my opinion the expectations u put on it are a little off the wall. I just dont appreciate CAHs direct insult at me, Id rather argue with him.
Post Review Comment
You must login or create an account to post a review comment.

 
Clicky Web Analytics